Neo-rationalism versus neo-darwinism: Integrating development and evolution [Book Review]

Biology and Philosophy 7 (4):431-451 (1992)
An increasing number of biologists are expressing discontent with the prevailing theory of neo-Darwinism. In particular, the tendency of neo-Darwinians to adopt genetic determinism and atomistic notions of both genes and organisms is seen as grossly unfair to the body of developmental theory. One faction of dissenteers, the Process Structuralists, take their inspiration from the rational morphologists who preceded Darwin. These neo-rationalists argue that a mature biology must possess universal laws and that these generative laws should be sought within organismal development. Such a rational biology will only be possible once the neo-Darwinian paradigm, with its reliance on inherently stochastic processes, is overthrown.To facilitate this revolution, process structuralism launches a broad attack on the theoritical adequacy of its opponent. It is charged that neo-Darwinism is untestable and therefore its hypotheses are nothing more than adaptive stories. Further, the lamentable tendencies toward genetic determinism and atomism by modern biologists is seen as the inescapable consequences of adopting the neo-Darwinian outlook.
Keywords Darwinism  epigenetic  genetic  genotype  phenotype  rationalism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00130061
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,191
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
The Anatomy of Inquiry.Israel Scheffler - 1963 - Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Organisers and Genes.C. H. Waddington - 1941 - Philosophy of Science 8 (3):463-463.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Extended Replicator.Kim Sterelny, Kelly C. Smith & Michael Dickison - 1996 - Biology and Philosophy 11 (3):377-403.
Two “EvoDevos”.Marta Linde Medina - 2010 - Biological Theory 5 (1):7-11.
The Rebirth of Rational Morphology.David Resnik - 1994 - Acta Biotheoretica 42 (1):1-14.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

35 ( #147,668 of 2,172,044 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,044 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums