On the ‘Emotionality’ of Environmental Restoration: Narratives of Guilt, Restitution, Redemption and Hope

Ethics, Policy and Environment 17 (3):286-307 (2014)

This paper presents a moral–emotional critique of environmental restoration, through discussion of narratives of redemption. The importance of ‘redemption’ vis-à-vis other environmental discourses rests with its capacity to unpack how, why and in what circumstances the idea of ‘putting something back’ for nature exerts a hold on the popular imagination. This paper thus examines the ethical and emotional experiences bound up in restoration discourses, to identify the motives deployed to confront shame and an associated guilt, and achieve restitution. In turn, the paper also offers new insights into the value of restored nature
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/21550085.2014.955321
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,122
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Pandora’s Hope.Bruno Latour - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Faking Nature.Robert Elliot - 1982 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):81 – 93.
.Holmes Rolston - 2006 - Oxford University Press.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
8 ( #882,597 of 2,289,307 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #842,814 of 2,289,307 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature