Philo 3 (1):32-40 (2000)

Abstract
Alvin Plantinga argues that secular evidentialism is false because the criteria of properly basic beliefs are either too restrictive or incoherent. I argue that Wittgenstein provides a better position on basic propositions (e.g. in On Certainty), which amounts to a more psychologically plausible vision of our epistemic foundations.
Keywords Plantinga  Basic Beliefs
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1098-3570
DOI 10.5840/philo2000314
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,607
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
63 ( #184,940 of 2,533,647 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #199,170 of 2,533,647 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes