Analysis 70 (1):3 - 10 (2010)
Timothy Smiley’s wonderful paper ‘Rejection’ (1996) is still perhaps not as well known or well understood as it should be. This note first gives a quick presentation of themes from that paper, though done in our own way, and then considers a putative line of objection – recently advanced by Julien Murzi and Ole Hjortland (2009) – to one of Smiley’s key claims. Along the way, we consider the prospects for an intuitionistic approach to some of the issues discussed in Smiley’s paper.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Inferentialism and the Categoricity Problem: Reply to Raatikainen.Julien Murzi & Ole Thomassen Hjortland - 2009 - Analysis 69 (3):480-488.
Citations of this work BETA
Bilateralism in Proof-Theoretic Semantics.Nissim Francez - 2014 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):239-259.
Similar books and articles
Axel Hägerström and His Early Version of Error Theory.Bo Petersson - 2011 - Theoria 77 (1):55-70.
Smiley's Distinction Between Rules of Inference and Rules of Proof.Lloyd Humberstone - 2010 - In T. J. Smiley, Jonathan Lear & Alex Oliver (eds.), The Force of Argument: Essays in Honor of Timothy Smiley. Routledge. pp. 107--126.
Commitment, Justification, and the Rejection of Natural Theology.Brendan Sweetman - 2003 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 77 (3):417-436.
The Force of Argument: Essays in Honor of Timothy Smiley.T. J. Smiley, Jonathan Lear & Alex Oliver (eds.) - 2010 - Routledge.
A Topos Perspective on the Kochen-Specker Theorem: IV. Interval Valuations.Jeremy Butterfield & Chris Isham - unknown
The Method of Axiomatic Rejection for the Intuitionistic Propositional Logic.Rafal Dutkiewicz - 1989 - Studia Logica 48 (4):449 - 459.
Added to index2009-11-21
Total downloads319 ( #9,423 of 2,177,988 )
Recent downloads (6 months)11 ( #28,038 of 2,177,988 )
How can I increase my downloads?