Religious language after J. L. austin1: James M. Smith and James wm. McClendon, jr

Religious Studies 8 (1):55-63 (1972)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

John L. Austin believed that in the illocution he had discovered a fundamental element of our speech, the understanding of which would disclose the significance of all kinds of linguistic action: not only proposing marriage and finding guilt, but also stating, reporting, conjecturing, and all the rest of the things men can do linguistically. 2 We claim that the illocution, the full-fledged speech-act, is central to religious utterances as well, and that it provides a perspicuity in understanding them not elsewhere provided in the work of recent philosophy of religion. In particular we hold that understanding religious talk through the illocution shows the way in which the representative and affective elements are connected to one another and to the utterance as a whole. There may, further, be features in such an analysis which can be extended to other forms of discourse than religious

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,247

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Understanding Religious Convictions.James William McClendon - 1975 - University of Notre Dame Press.
Religion Without Speech?Lance Ashdown - 2003 - Ars Disputandi 3.
Wittgenstein and Religion.Michael Kober - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 71 (1):87-116.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-05

Downloads
30 (#385,836)

6 months
1 (#415,205)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

J.L. Austin ve I. Kant’ta Kategorik Önermeler ve Mental Nedensellik Problemleri.Atilla Akalın - 2020 - Sosyal, Beşeri Ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi 3 (8):624-631.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references