Subjective rightness

Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (2):64-110 (2010)
Abstract
Twentieth century philosophers introduced the distinction between “objective rightness” and “subjective rightness” to achieve two primary goals. The first goal is to reduce the paradoxical tension between our judgments of (i) what is best for an agent to do in light of the actual circumstances in which she acts and (ii) what is wisest for her to do in light of her mistaken or uncertain beliefs about her circumstances. The second goal is to provide moral guidance to an agent who may be uncertain about the circumstances in which she acts, and hence is unable to use her standard moral principle directly in deciding what to do. This paper distinguishes two important senses of “moral guidance”; proposes criteria of adequacy for accounts of subjective rightness; canvasses existing definitions for “subjective rightness”; finds them all deficient; and proposes a new and more successful account. It argues that each comprehensive moral theory must include multiple principles of subjective rightness to address the epistemic situations of the full range of moral decision-makers, and shows that accounts of subjective rightness formulated in terms of what it would reasonable for the agent to believe cannot provide that guidance.
Keywords subjective obligation  objective obligation  subjective ought  objective ought  dual-oughts view  subjective rightness
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052509990161
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point.R. M. Hare (ed.) - 1981 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 52 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Normativity Without Cartesian Privilege.Amia Srinivasan - 2015 - Philosophical Issues 25 (1):273-299.
Collectives' Duties and Collectivisation Duties.Stephanie Collins - 2013 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 91 (2):231-248.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Objective and Subjective 'Ought'.Ralph Wedgwood - 2016 - In Nate Charlow & Matthew Chrisman (eds.), Deontic Modality. Oxford University Press. pp. 143-168.
Nagel on Subjective and Objective.V. Haksar - 1981 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 24 (March):105-21.
Subjective Reasons.Eric Vogelstein - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (2):239-257.
Subjective and Objective.Thomas Nagel - 1979 - In Mortal Questions. Cambridge University Press. pp. 207-222.
Subjective and Objective Rightness.John M. Hems - 1954 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 15 (4):558-562.
A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism.Gerald Lang - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
Added to PP index
2010-06-17

Total downloads
523 ( #3,462 of 2,197,306 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #14,098 of 2,197,306 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature