Continental Philosophy Review 38 (1-2):89-123 (2005)
This article examines Gilles Deleuze’s concept of the simulacrum, which Deleuze formulated in the context of his reading of Nietzsche’s project of “overturning Platonism.” The essential Platonic distinction, Deleuze argues, is more profound than the speculative distinction between model and copy, original and image. The deeper, practical distinction moves between two kinds of images or eidolon, for which the Platonic Idea is meant to provide a concrete criterion of selection “Copies” or icons (eikones) are well-grounded claimants to the transcendent Idea, authenticated by their internal resemblance to the Idea, whereas “simulacra” (phantasmata) are like false claimants, built on a dissimilarity and implying an essential perversion or deviation from the Idea. If the goal of Platonism is the triumph of icons over simulacra, the inversion of Platonism would entail an affirmation of the simulacrum as such, which must thus be given its own concept. Deleuze consequently defines the simulacrum in terms of an internal dissimilitude or “disparateness,” which in turn implies a new conception of Ideas, no longer as self-identical qualities (the auto kath’hauto), but rather as constituting a pure concept of difference. An inverted Platonism would necessarily be based on a purely immanent and differential conception of Ideas. Starting from this new conception of the Idea, Deleuze proposes to take up the Platonic project anew, rethinking the fundamental figures of Platonism (selection, repetition, ungrounding, the question-problem complex) on a purely differential basis. In this sense, Deleuze’s inverted Platonism can at the same time be seen as a rejuvenated Platonism and even a completed Platonism.
|Keywords||Philosophy Political Philosophy Philosophy of Man Phenomenology|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Another Use of the Concept of the Simulacrum: Deleuze, Lucretius and the Practical Critique of Demystification.Ryan J. Johnson - 2014 - Deleuze Studies 8 (1):70-93.
Authenticating the Leader: Why Bill George Believes That a Moral Compass Would Have Kept Jeffrey Skilling Out of Jail.Christian Garmann Johnsen - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics.
Similar books and articles
Deleuze's Concept of the Virtual and the Critique of the Possible.Daniel W. Smith - 2009 - Journal of Philosophy: A Cross-Disciplinary Inquiry 4 (9):34-43.
Sense, Category, Questions: Reading Deleuze with Ryle.Peter Kügler - 2011 - Deleuze Studies 5 (3):324-339.
Deleuze/Derrida: Towards an Almost Imperceptible Difference.Kir Kuiken - 2005 - Research in Phenomenology 35 (1):290-310.
The Ontology of Memory: Bergson's Reversal of Platonism.Leonard Lawlor - 2003 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 8 (1):69-102.
The Rights of Simulacra: Deleuze and the Univocity of Being. [REVIEW]Nathan Widder - 2001 - Continental Philosophy Review 34 (4):437-453.
Innate Ideas Without Abstract Ideas: An Essay on Berkeley's Platonism.John Russell Roberts - manuscript
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads620 ( #2,170 of 2,178,170 )
Recent downloads (6 months)240 ( #344 of 2,178,170 )
How can I increase my downloads?