The importance of the subject in objective morality: Distinguishing objective from intrinsic value: Tara Smith

Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):126-148 (2008)

Abstract
This essay contends that the debate between subjectivism and objectivism in ethics is better understood as a dispute among three alternatives: subjectivism, objectivism, and intrinsicism. Ayn Rand has identified intrinsicism – the belief that certain things are good “in, by, and of” themselves – as the doctrine that is actually operative in many defenses of moral objectivity. What intrinsicism fails to appreciate, however, is the significant role of the subject, the person to whom and for whom anything can be valuable. Objective value, in Rand's view, is relational. Its existence depends on contributions of both external reality and human consciousness. Values are not reducible to psychological states, as in subjectivism, but nor are they independent of them, as in intrinsicism. Objectivity in ethics is attained neither through revelation of the intrinsic property of goodness nor through the subject's creation of goodness, but through a rational procedure of evaluation that is governed by the method of objectivity. This essay is in three parts, explaining Rand's view of exactly what intrinsicism is; elaborating on her view of the nature of moral objectivity; and highlighting certain features that make plain the differences between an intrinsicist and an objectivist account of value.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0265052508080059
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Axiomatizing Umwelt Normativity.Marc Champagne - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (1):9-59.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Judicial Review in an Objective Legal System.Tara Smith - 2015 - Cambridge University Press.
Postmodernism, Value and Objectivity.R. Attfield - 2001 - Environmental Values 10 (2):145-162.
Objectivity and Natural Laws.Gal Yehezkel - 2013 - Analysis and Metaphysics 12:116–132.
Ethical Scepticism and the Decision to Be Moral.Teresa Elizabeth Mcgarrity - 1993 - Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo
A Reply To Miss Smith.W. D. Glasgow - 1958 - Philosophy 33 (124):57-.
Moral Objectivity: A Kantian Illusion?Carla Bagnoli - 2015 - Journal of Value Inquiry 49 (1-2):31-45.
Subjectivism is Pointless.Michael J. Raven - 2013 - Logos and Episteme 4 (1):733-748.
Why Moral Judgments Can Be Objective: Tibor R. Machan.Tibor R. Machan - 2008 - Social Philosophy and Policy 25 (1):100-125.
Flourishing Objectivism. [REVIEW]Lester Hunt - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 1 (3):105-115.
Flourishing Objectivism. [REVIEW]Lester Hunt - 2000 - Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 2 (1):105 - 115.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
74 ( #116,653 of 2,280,598 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #151,683 of 2,280,598 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature