Ethics 114 (4):790-805 (2004)

Authors
Saul Smilansky
University of Haifa
Abstract
Bernard Williams once said that doing moral philosophy could be hazardous because there, presumably unlike in other areas of philosophy, we may run the risk of misleading people on important matters.1 This risk seems to be particularly present when considering the topic of terrorism. I would like to discuss what seems to be a most striking feature of contemporary terrorism, a feature that, as far as I know, has not been noted. This has implications concerning the way that we should view terrorism (and counterterrorism) and shows the force of a number of neglected illusions surrounding the issue of terrorism, as well as its justification.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/383443
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,901
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Defining Terrorism – a Typology.Tamar Meisels - 2009 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 12 (3):331-351.
Military Ethics of Fighting Terror: Response.Asa Kasher & Amos Yadlin - 2005 - Journal of Military Ethics 4 (1):60-70.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
152 ( #67,347 of 2,439,052 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #434,440 of 2,439,052 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes