Faith and Philosophy 5 (3):283-290 (1988)
The traditional paradox of the stone may be interpreted as posing a competition between a pair of omnipotent beings, represented by God at two different times. The new paradox poses a question about simultaneous competition between a pair of omnipotent beings. We make use of an attractive Thomistic response to the former paradox in arguing that the latter situation is logically possible
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The New Paradox of the Stone Revisited.Erik J. Wielenberg - 2001 - Faith and Philosophy 18 (2):261-268.
The Principle of Uniform Solution (of the Paradoxes of Self-Reference).Nicholas J. J. Smith - 2000 - Mind 109 (433):117-122.
The No-No Paradox Is a Paradox.Roy T. Cook - 2011 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 89 (3):467-482.
The Donation Paradox for Peremptory Challenges.Joseph B. Kadane, Christopher A. Stone & Garrick Wallstrom - 1999 - Theory and Decision 47 (2):139-155.
Probabilistic Causality and Simpson's Paradox.Richard Otte - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):110-125.
Equiparadoxicality of Yablo's Paradox and the Liar.Ming Hsiung - 2013 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 22 (1):23-31.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads55 ( #92,953 of 2,154,135 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,154,135 )
How can I increase my downloads?