The syntax and interpretation of temporal expressions in English

Linguistics and Philosophy 2 (1):43 - 99 (1978)
Abstract
The only obligatory temporal expression in English is tense, yet Hans Reichenbach (1947) has argued convincingly that the simplest sentence is understood in terms of three temporal notions. Additional possibilities for a simple sentence are limited: English sentences have one time adverbial each. It is not immediately clear how to resolve these matters, that is, how (if at all) Reichenbach's account can be reconciled with the facts of English. This paper attempts to show that they can be reconciled, and presents an analysis of temporal specification that is based directly on Reichenbach's account.Part I is devoted to a study of the way the three times—speech time, reference time, event time—are realized and interpreted. The relevant syntactic structures and their interaction and interpretation are examined in detail. Part II discusses how a grammar should deal with time specification, and proposes a set of interpretive rules. The study offers an analysis of simple sentences, sentences with complements, and habitual sentences. It is shown that tense and adverbials function differently, depending on the structure in which they appear. The temporal system is relational: the orientation and values of temporal expressions are not fixed, but their relational values are consistent. This consistency allows the statement of principles of interpretation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00365130
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Elements of Symbolic Logic.Hans Reichenbach - 1947 - Dover Publications.
Tense and Time Reference in English.James D. McCawley - 1971 - In Charles J. Fillmore & D. Terence Langėndoen (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Semantics. Irvington. pp. 96--113.
On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects.H. J. Verkuyl - 1972 - Dordrecht, Netherlands: D.Reidel Publishing Company.
Toward a Linguistic Theory of Speech Acts.Bernard Comrie & Jerrold Sadock - 1976 - Philosophical Quarterly 26 (104):285.
Tense and Mood in Indo-European Syntax.Paul Kiparsky - 1968 - Foundations of Language 4 (1):30-57.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nominal and Temporal Anaphora.Barbara H. Partee - 1984 - Linguistics and Philosophy 7 (3):243--286.
Temporal Semantics in a Superficially Tenseless Language.Lisa Matthewson - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (6):673 - 713.
Why Will is Not a Modal.Mikhail Kissine - 2008 - Natural Language Semantics 16 (2):129-155.
Tenses, Time Adverbs, and Compositional Semantic Theory.David R. Dowty - 1982 - Linguistics and Philosophy 5 (1):23 - 55.
Double-Access Sentences and Reference to States.Toshiyuki Ogihara - 1995 - Natural Language Semantics 3 (2):177-210.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
74 ( #76,922 of 2,210,135 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #163,264 of 2,210,135 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature