Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (2):89 - 94 (2000)
AbstractThis article challenges the view of disability presented by Harris in his article, “Is gene therapy a form of eugenics?”1 It is argued that his definition of disability rests on an individual model of disability, where disability is regarded as a product of biological determinism or “personal tragedy” in the individual. Within disability theory this view is often called “the medical model” and it has been criticised for not being able to deal with the term “disability”, but only with impairment. The individual model of disability presupposes a necessary causal link between a certain condition in the individual and disablement. The shortcomings of such a view of disability are stated and it is argued that in order to have an adequate ethical discourse on gene therapy perspectives from disability research need to be taken into consideration
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Non-Identity, Self-Defeat, and Attitudes to Future Children.Guy Kahane - 2009 - Philosophical Studies 145 (2):193-214.
Redefining Disability: Maleficent, Unjust and Inconsistent.B. Cox-White & S. F. Boxall - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (6):558-576.
Das Problem der Behindertenselektion bei der pränatalen Diagnostik und der Präimplantationsdiagnostik.Weyma Lübbe - 2003 - Ethik in der Medizin 15 (3):203-220.
Purebred Dogs and Canine Wellbeing.Sofia Jeppsson - 2014 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 27 (3):417-430.
Redefining Disability: A Rejoinder to a Critique.Solveig Magnus Reindal - 2010 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 1 (1):125-135.
Similar books and articles
Human Gene Therapy: Why Draw a Line?W. French Anderson - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (6):681-693.
Human Gene Therapy: Scientific and Ethical Considerations.W. French Anderson - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):275-292.
Should We Change the Human Genome?Torbjörn Tännsjö - 1993 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (3).
Ethical Issues in and Beyond Prospective Clinical Trials of Human Gene Therapy.John C. Fletcher - 1985 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):293-310.
Developmental Perspective on the Emergence of Moral Personhood.James C. Harris - 2010 - In Eva Feder Kittay & Licia Carlson (eds.), Cognitive Disability and its Challenge to Moral Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 55--73.
Shaping Individuality: Human Inheritable Germ Line Gene Modification.Maurizio Salvi - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (6):527-542.
Interventions in the Human Genome: Some Moral and Ethical Considerations.Gerd Richter & Matthew D. Bacchetta - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):303 – 317.
Everworse: What's Wrong with Selecting for Disability?Mark Greene & Steven Augello - 2011 - Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (2):131-140.
Genetic Research as Therapy: Implications of "Gene Therapy" for Informed Consent.Larry R. Churchill, Myra L. Collins, Nancy M. R. King, Stephen G. Pemberton & Keith A. Wailoo - 1998 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 26 (1):38-47.
Germ-Line Gene Therapy: A New Stage of Debate.John C. Fletcher & W. French Anderson - 1992 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 20 (1-2):26-39.
Can Enhancement Be Distinguished From Prevention in Genetic Medicine?Eric T. Juengst - 1997 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (2):125-142.
Germ-Line Gene Therapy and the Clinical Ethos of Medical Genetics.Gregory Fowler, Eric T. Juengst & Burke K. Zimmerman - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (2).