Art and negative affect

Philosophy Compass 4 (1):39-55 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Why do people seemingly want to be scared by movies and feel pity for fictional characters when they avoid situations in real life that arouse these same negative emotions? Although the domain of relevant artworks encompasses far more than just tragedy, the general problem is typically called the paradox of tragedy. The paradox boils down to a simple question: If people avoid pain then why do people want to experience art that is painful? I discuss six popular solutions to the paradox: conversion, control, compensatory, meta-response, catharsis, and rich experience theories.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-02-27

Downloads
4,286 (#2,088)

6 months
549 (#2,966)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Aaron Smuts
Rhode Island College

Citations of this work

On the Value of Sad Music.Mario Attie-Picker, Tara Venkatesan, George E. Newman & Joshua Knobe - 2024 - The Journal of Aesthetic Education 58 (1):46-65.
Imagination.Shen-yi Liao & Tamar Gendler - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Let’s be Liberal: An Alternative to Aesthetic Hedonism.Antonia Peacocke - 2021 - British Journal of Aesthetics 61 (2):163-183.
Imagination.Tamar Szabó Gendler - 2012 - In Ed Zalta, Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 32 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The methods of ethics.Henry Sidgwick - 1907 - Bristol, U.K.: Thoemmes Press. Edited by Emily Elizabeth Constance Jones.
Welfare, happiness, and ethics.L. W. Sumner - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Essays, Moral, Political, and Literary.David Hume - 1875 - Indianapolis: Liberty Press. Edited by Eugene F. Miller.

View all 28 references / Add more references