Contemporary Aesthetics 2 (2005)
I argue that by any major definition of art many modern video games should be considered art. Rather than defining art and defending video games based on a single contentious definition, I offer reasons for thinking that video games can be art according to historical, aesthetic, institutional, representational and expressive theories of art. Overall, I argue that while many video games probably should not be considered art, there are good reasons to think that some video games should be classified as art. I also show that the debates over the artistic status of chess and sports offer some insights into the status of video games.
|Keywords||video games art sport philosophy of film|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Helpless Spectators: Suspense in Videogames and Film.Aaron Smuts & Jonathan Frome - 2004 - Text Technology 1 (1):13-34.
Film Theory Meets Video Games: An Analysis of the Issues and Methodologies in 'ScreenPlay'. [REVIEW]Aaron Smuts - 2003 - Film-Philosophy 7 (54).
Locating the Wrongness in Ultra-Violent Video Games.David I. Waddington - 2007 - Ethics and Information Technology 9 (2):121-128.
Defending the Morality of Violent Video Games.Marcus Schulzke - 2010 - Ethics and Information Technology 12 (2):127-138.
Added to index2009-06-03
Total downloads747 ( #1,299 of 2,164,544 )
Recent downloads (6 months)29 ( #11,173 of 2,164,544 )
How can I increase my downloads?