Inquiry 9 (1-4):73-93 (1966)
Soviet attitude towards Bohr reflects changes in the ideological approach to science. During the last period before Stalin's death ?danov proclaimed the campaign against Western influence in Soviet philosophy and science. Nevertheless the physicist M. A. Markov tried to introduce complementarity as a materialistic interpretation of quantum?mechanics in 1948. He was officially condemned. This was followed by a period (1948?54) during which heavy attacks were made against the Copenhagen school. In 1958, after a personal exchange of thoughts with Bohr, academician Fock declared complementarity and probability to be irreversible steps towards a new insight into physical reality, at the same time correcting some of Bohr's epistemological conceptions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
V. P. Branskij: Die Philosophische Bedeutung Des Anschaulichkeitsproblems in der Modernen Physik.Siegfried Müller-Markus - 1963 - Studies in East European Thought 3 (3):191-201.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation.Kristian Camilleri - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (1):pp. 26-57.
The Kantian Framework of Complementarity.Michael Cuffaro - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 41 (4):309-317.
Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible?Ravi Gomatam - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):736-748.
The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics.John Honner - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
Niels Bohr in the Darkness and Light of Soviet Philosophy.M. S. - 1966 - Inquiry 9 (1-4):73 – 93.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads11 ( #385,468 of 2,059,555 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #396,194 of 2,059,555 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.