Craig on God and Morality


Authors
Michael Rectenwald
New York University
Abstract
In this paper we critically evaluate an argument put forward by William Lane Craig for the existence of God based on the assumption that if there were no God, there could be no objective morality. Contrary to Craig, we show that there are some necessary moral truths and objective moral reasoning that holds up whether there is a God or not. We go on to argue that religious faith, when taken alone and without reason or evidence, actually risks undermining morality and is an unreliable source of moral truths. We recommend a viewpoint on morality that is based on reason and public consensus, that is compatible with science, and that cuts across the range of religious and non-religious positions.
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  History of Philosophy
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0019-0365
DOI ipq201151335
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

God and the Ontological Foundation of Morality.Wes Morriston - 2012 - Religious Studies 48 (1):15 - 34.
Morality and Scripture.Anthony Ellis - 1996 - Teaching Philosophy 19 (3):233-246.
On Shermer On Morality.Christian Miller - 2016 - Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences:63-68.
Liberal Morality and Socialist Morality.W. B. Gallie - 1949 - Philosophy 24 (91):318 - 334.
Morality and Hebraic Christian Religion.Jason S. Wright - 1981 - Journal of Moral Education 11 (1):32-40.
Rejoinder to William Lane Craig.David B. Myers - 2003 - Religious Studies 39 (4):427-430.
The Scope of Instrumental Morality.Michael Moehler - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (2):431-451.
Moral Disagreement Among Philosophers.Ralph Wedgwood - 2014 - In Michael Bergmann & Patrick Kain (eds.), Challenges to Moral and Religious Belief: Disagreement and Evolution. Oxford University Press. pp. 23-39.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-06-17

Total views
2,249 ( #712 of 2,271,536 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
421 ( #784 of 2,271,536 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature