Contextual definition: What Frege might have meant but probably didn't

Noûs 8 (3):259-272 (1974)

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,766

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
16 (#671,836)

6 months
3 (#198,075)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

Frege’s View of the Context Principle After 1890.Krystian Bogucki - 2022 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 99 (1):1-29.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Frege's Alleged Realism.Hans D. Sluga - 1977 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 20 (1-4):227 – 242.
Frege's Content-Principle and Relevant Deducibility.Neil Tennant - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):245-258.
I. Frege as a Realist.Michael Dummett - 1976 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 19 (1-4):455-468.
Hale on Caesar.Peter Sullivan & Michael Potter - 1997 - Philosophia Mathematica 5 (2):135--52.
Contextual Definition and Ontological Commitment.Dirk Greimann - 2009 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87 (3):357 – 373.
Vagueness and Analysis.Newton Garver - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Research 24 (1):1-19.
Referentiality in Frege's Grundgesetze.Martin Edward - 1982 - History and Philosophy of Logic 3 (2):151-164.