Trans/Form/Ação 36 (2):45-62 (2013)

Authors
Abstract
In this paper, it is argued that only in the section on dialectic in the Critique of Judgment does Kant reach a definitive and conclusive version of deduction, after discovering the concept of the supersensible. In the section on the deduction of pure aesthetic judgments, Kant does not satisfactorily explain the critical distinction between the sensible nature of humanity and the supersensible nature of human reason presupposed in the concept of universal communicability. While the concept of the supersensible illustrates this distinction, it is only through this concept that Kant that can justify the specific possibility of claiming subjective validity in taste. The priority of the solution found in the dialectic is illustrated not only by a comparative analysis of the two sections, but also by a historical reconstruction of the process of the formation of the work, which shows that the first formulation of the concept of validity coincides with the use of the concept of the supersensible.
Keywords Kant  Supersensible    Deduction  Dialectic  Judgment  Judgment of Taste  Critique of Judgment
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1590/S0101-31732013000200004
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,568
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Kritik der reinen Vernunft.Immanuel Kant & Benno Erumann - 1901 - Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 9 (2):6-7.
La formazione del testo della Kritik der Urteilskraft.Giorgio Tonelli - 1954 - Revue Internationale de Philosophie 8 (4):423-448.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Eine andere Art von Gefühl der Lust beim Kantischen Geschmacksurteil.Hye-Jin Lee - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 16:283-291.
What is Claimed in a Kantian Judgment of Taste?Miles Rind - 2000 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 38 (1):63-85.
Can Kants Deduction of Judgments of Taste Be Saved?Miles Rind - 2002 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 84 (1):20-45.
Ingenio, Uso Hipotético de la Razón y Juicio Reflexionante en la Filosofía de Kant.Manuel Sánchez Rodríguez - 2012 - Anales Del Seminario de Historia de la Filosofía 29 (2):577-592.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-12-01

Total views
77 ( #125,721 of 2,385,660 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #373,313 of 2,385,660 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes