Consent and the acquisition of organs for transplantation

HEC Forum 21 (1):55-69 (2009)

Authors
Andrew Sneddon
University of Ottawa
Abstract
The two most commonly discussed and implemented rationales for acquiring organs for transplantation give consent a central role. I argue that such centrality is a mistake. The reason is that practices of consent serve only to respect patients as autonomous beings. The primary issue in acquiring organs for transplantation, however, is how it is appropriate to treat a newly non-autonomous being. Once autonomy and consent are dislodged from their central position, considerations of utility and fairness take a more prominent position. On the basis of these values, a strongly suggestive moral case is presented for routinely harvesting organs for transplantation.
Keywords organ transplantation  consent
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10730-009-9087-8
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,780
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Moral Theory of Informed Consent.Benjamin Freedman - 1975 - Hastings Center Report 5 (4):32-39.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-03-04

Total views
54 ( #153,028 of 2,265,017 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #860,568 of 2,265,017 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature