In Martijn Blaauw (ed.), Contrastivism in Philosophy: New Perspectives. Routledge (2012)

Authors
Justin Snedegar
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
This paper argues for contrastivism about the deontic modals, 'ought', 'must', and 'may'. A simple contrastivist semantics that predicts the desired entailment relations among these modals is offered.
Keywords deontic modals  ought  contrastivism
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Elusive Knowledge.David K. Lewis - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (4):549 – 567.
Logic and Conversation.H. Paul Grice - 1975 - In Maite Ezcurdia & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Boundary in Philosophy. Broadview Press. pp. 47.
Moral Skepticisms.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Ought, Agents, and Actions.M. Schroeder - 2011 - Philosophical Review 120 (1):1-41.
Knowing the Answer.Jonathan Schaffer - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):383-403.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Instrumental Reasons.Niko Kolodny - forthcoming - In Daniel Star (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity. Oxford University Press.
Actualism, Possibilism, and Beyond.Jacob Ross - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics.
One Ought Too Many.Stephen Finlay & Justin Snedegar - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):102-124.
Epistemic and Deontic Should.Fabrizio Cariani - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):73-84.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Imperatives and Modals.Paul Portner - 2007 - Natural Language Semantics 15 (4):351-383.
What We Know and What to Do.Nate Charlow - 2013 - Synthese 190 (12):2291-2323.
Modals with a Taste of the Deontic.Zoltán Gendler Szabó & Joshua Knobe - 2013 - Semantics and Pragmatics 6 (1):1-42.
Two Puzzles About Deontic Necessity.Dilip Ninan - 2005 - In J. Gajewski, V. Hacquard, B. Nickel & S. Yalcin (eds.), New Work on Modality, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
One Ought Too Many.Stephen Finlay & Justin Snedegar - 2014 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 89 (1):102-124.
Expressivism Concerning Epistemic Modals.Benjamin Schnieder - 2010 - Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):601-615.
Fallibilism and the Flexibility of Epistemic Modals.Charity Anderson - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 167 (3):597-606.
An Extension of the Deontic Calculus DSC.Leon Gumański - 1983 - Studia Logica 42 (2-3):129 - 137.
Ifs and Oughts.Niko Kolodny & John MacFarlane - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (3):115-143.
Adaptive Domains of Deontic Reasoning.Laurence Fiddick - 2006 - Philosophical Explorations 9 (1):105 – 116.
On Deontic Logic.Leon Gumański - 1980 - Studia Logica 39 (1):63 - 75.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-24

Total views
139 ( #73,969 of 2,439,097 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
11 ( #58,930 of 2,439,097 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes