Taking Empirically Minded Moral Philosophy Seriously

Dialogue 40 (03):603- (2001)
This is a critique of Wayne Fenske's attempt to provide an a posteriori defense of internalism and consequently an argument against the possibility of amoralism.
Keywords amoralism  Millikan  Fenske
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0012217300018953
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,479
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Jeanette Kennett (2002). Autism, Empathy and Moral Agency. Philosophical Quarterly 52 (208):340-357.
Philip Clark (2004). Kantian Morals and Humean Motives. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (1):109–126.
W. Fenske (1997). Non-Cognitivism: A New Defense. [REVIEW] Journal of Value Inquiry 31 (3):301-309.
Hans Fenske (1988). Max Weber as Historian. Philosophy and History 21 (1):95-96.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

3 ( #666,979 of 1,925,792 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #418,414 of 1,925,792 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.