Environmental Ethics 3 (3):231-235 (1981)
David Ehrenfeld argues that humanism emphasizes reason at the expense of emotion, and that its narrow focus on the use of reason to serve human interests leads to a dichotomy between man and nature in which ecological factors are subordinated to the satisfaction of human wants. In response, I argue that: (1) humanists stress employment of reflective reason and reason’s interrelations with other aspectsofthe human personality, (2) humanism’s typical commitment to naturalism locates man as part of nature and does not entail an exclusive focus on human interests, and (3) humanism’s commitment to the legitimate sphere of human interests does not entail indifference to nonhuman nature, for a healthy environment is necessary for the long-term satisfaction of human interests
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Religion and the Human Future: An Essay on Theological Humanism.David E. Klemm - 2008 - Blackwell.
Humanism Revisited: A Review of Kate Soper's Humanism and Anti-Humanism. [REVIEW]James J. Valone - 1991 - Human Studies 14 (1):67 - 79.
DR. AMBEDKAR's VIEWS ON HUMANISM AND BUDDHISM.Desh Raj Sirswal - 2010 - In Dr B. R. Langayan (ed.), Relevance of Thoughts of Dr. Dr. Ambedkar in the Present Times. Sahitya Sansthan, Gajiabad.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #353,482 of 2,169,416 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,460 of 2,169,416 )
How can I increase my downloads?