The HIV/AIDS crisis and corporate moral responsibility in the light of the Levinasian notions of proximity and the third
Business Ethics 16 (3):278–285 (2007)
This paper focuses on the set of problems regarding the HIV/AIDS crisis in the specific domain of corporate moral responsibility within a context of the Levinasian notion of proximity (infinite responsibility) and the Third. Against a totalitarian, homogeneous society, Levinas opens the way to a social pluralism, which has its sources in the disquiet provoked by the strangeness of the Other's face. Corporate responsibility, understood from this point of view, would not reduce institutional relations to an anonymous world of neutrality. Corporate responsibility is unconditional in the sense that to be responsible is not a question of choice, but one of deep liberty, the liberty of taking the burden of the infinite responsibility for the Other customers, employees, the public at large and those who suffer in the world. This paper argues that it would then also mean that society (individuals, NGOs and governments) in accordance with the spirit of the Levinasian philosophy of infinite responsibility could exert pressure on corporations, such as pharmaceutical companies. Owing to their power, they could change their present responsibility policies to a more affirmative and engaged responsibility with regard to those who are ill and who suffer death or debilitation from HIV/AIDS and other prevalent diseases in the poorest parts of the world today.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Totality and Infinity: An Essay on Exteriority.Emmanuel Levinas - 1969 - Distribution for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Boston.
The Corporate Social Responsibility of The Pharmaceutical Industry: Idealism Without Illusion and Realism Without Resignation.Klaus M. Leisinger - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):577-594.
The Corporate Social Responsibility of The Pharmaceutical Industry.Klaus M. Leisinger - 2005 - Business Ethics Quarterly 15 (4):577-594.
The Ethical Significance of Illeity (Emmanuel Lévinas).Michael Purcell - 1996 - Heythrop Journal 37 (2):125–138.
The Third Party. Levinas on the Intersection of the Ethical and the Political.R. Bernasconi - 1999 - Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 30:76-87.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Corporate Moral Responsibility: What Can We Infer From Our Understanding of Organisations? [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 30 (2):161 - 169.
A Political Account of Corporate Moral Responsibility.Jeffery Smith - 2011 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 14 (2):223 - 246.
“AIDS is Not a Business”.William Flanagan & Gail Whiteman - 2005 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 2:375-391.
The Idea of Corporate Social Responsibility.Jacob Dahi Rendtorff - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:111-117.
Public Relations and Corporate Social Responsibility: Some Issues Arising. [REVIEW]Jacquie L'Etang - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):111 - 123.
The Impossibility of Corporate Ethics: For a Levinasian Approach to Managerial Ethics.David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec - 2007 - Business Ethics 16 (3):208–219.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads16 ( #292,835 of 2,153,584 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,274 of 2,153,584 )
How can I increase my downloads?