The Monist 77 (4):509-530 (1994)

A detailed examination of the philosophy of science of Evelyn Fox Keller, with special emphasis on her account of "objectivity" and her understanding of the methodology of Barbara McClintock.
Keywords Science, Feminism, Fox Keller, McClintock, Objectivity, Realism, Masculinity
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI 10.5840/monist199477431
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Maternal Thinking.Sara Ruddick - 1980 - Feminist Studies 6 (2):342.
Cognitive and Non-Cognitive Values in Science: Rethinking the Dichotomy.Helen E. Longino - 1996 - In Lynn Hankinson Nelson & Jack Nelson (eds.), Feminism, Science, and the Philosophy of Science. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 39--58.
Maternal Thinking.Jean P. Rumsey - 1990 - Hypatia 5 (3):125-131.
Uncovering Gynocentric Science.Ruth Ginzberg - 1987 - Hypatia 2 (3):89-105.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

In Defense of Bacon.Alan Soble - 1995 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 25 (2):192-215.
Bad Apples: Feminist Politics and Feminist Scholarship.Alan Soble - 1999 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 29 (3):354-388.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
4,916 ( #584 of 2,518,863 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
302 ( #1,482 of 2,518,863 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes