To give a surprise exam, use game theory

Synthese 115 (3):355-373 (1998)
Abstract
This paper proposes a game-theoretic solution of the surprise examination problem. It is argued that the game of “matching pennies” provides a useful model for the interaction of a teacher who wants her exam to be surprising and students who want to avoid being surprised. A distinction is drawn between prudential and evidential versions of the problem. In both, the teacher should not assign a probability of zero to giving the exam on the last day. This representation of the problem provides a diagnosis of where the backwards induction argument, which “proves” that no surprise exam is possible, is mistaken.
Keywords Philosophy   Philosophy   Epistemology   Logic   Metaphysics   Philosophy of Language
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1005012607804
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,215
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Game Theory in Philosophy.Bruin Boudewijn De - 2005 - Topoi 24 (2):197-208.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Equivocation in the Surprise Exam Paradox.Kenneth G. Ferguson - 1991 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):291-302.
The Surprise Exam Paradox.John N. Williams - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:67-94.
The Surprise Exam Paradox: Disentangling Two Reductios.John N. Williams - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32:67-94.
On Paradoxes and a Surprise Exam.Richard L. Kirkham - 1991 - Philosophia 21 (1-2):31-51.
How to Set a Surprise Exam.Ned Hall - 1999 - Mind 108 (432):647-703.
The Goals and Merits of a Business Ethics Competency Exam.Earl W. Spurgin - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (3):279-288.
The Logic of Backwards Inductions.Graham Priest - 2000 - Economics and Philosophy 16 (2):267-285.
The Solution to the Surprise Exam Paradox.Ken Levy - 2009 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 47 (2):131-158.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

68 ( #76,747 of 2,164,555 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

6 ( #50,909 of 2,164,555 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums