Journal of Religious Ethics 20 (1):93 - 110 (1992)

Abstract
A close reading of Luther's treatise on "Temporal Authority" and a review of the most pertinent Luther scholarship show why Luther's doctrine of the two kingdoms remains notoriously difficult to interpret. Reinhold Niebuhr's criticism of Luther in "The Nature and Destiny of Man" is representative of widespread discontent with Luther's argument, but Niebuhr misses the soteriological point of Luther's distinction between the two kingdoms and the significance of salvation for life in society. Ironically, Niebuhr must cite Luther in such a way as to confuse the kingdoms in order to support his charge that Luther's position leads to "quietism" and "defeatism.".
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,949
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Heidegger on Luther on Paul.Timothy Stanley - 2007 - Dialog: A Journal of Theology 46 (1):41-45.
The Bondage of the Will.Martin Luther - 1923 - London: Sovereign Grace Union.
The Political Theories of Martin Luther.Luther Hess Waring - 1910 - Port Washington, N.Y., Kennikat Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-05-29

Total views
25 ( #415,980 of 2,409,860 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #541,271 of 2,409,860 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes