Bakhtiniana 17 (2):29-57 (2022)

Abstract
ABSTRACT This article aims to defend the dialogical nature of the landscape. Working in between the borders of the Bakhtinian philosophy of language and cultural studies on landscape, we defend that landscape study should not be studied without considering the cultural forms of communication in the different domains of social organization– the speech genres; that landscape is a semiotic encounter with a concrete otherness; that the interpreter who emerges when an area enters a relationship of representation is necessarily characterized as a chronotope; that every landscape is a chronotopic representation; that cultural geography recognizes that the semiotic aspects of the landscape are as material as its morphology. We start from the hypothesis that landscape is a chronotopic representation that is always made possible by means of some speech genre, because it is always a communicative process, and an encounter with another in a situation of socially organized interrelation – it is concrete dialogue. To find the deeper meaning of a landscape, one must recognize and understand its material, historical, geographical, and dialogic nature. RESUMO O artigo objetiva defender a índole dialógica da paisagem. Trabalhando na fronteira entre a filosofia bakhtiniana da linguagem e os estudos culturais da paisagem, defendemos que a paisagem não seja estudada sem considerar as formas culturais de comunicação nos diferentes domínios da organização social – os gêneros discursivos; que toda paisagem é encontro semiótico com uma alteridade concreta; que o intérprete que emerge quando uma área entra em relação de representação é necessariamente caracterizado por um cronotopo; que toda paisagem é representação cronotópica; que a geografia cultural reconheça que os aspectos semióticos da paisagem são tão materiais quanto sua morfologia. Partimos da hipótese de que a paisagem é uma representação cronotópica que sempre se realiza através de algum gênero discursivo, pois sempre é um processo comunicativo e de encontro com o outro em uma situação de inter-relação socialmente organizada – é diálogo concreto. Para adentrar à profundeza de seus sentidos, precisa-se reconhecer e compreender sua índole material, histórica, geográfica e dialógica.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1590/2176-4573e55082
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,039
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Peirce and Bakhtin.Jason Barrett-Fox - 2004 - American Journal of Semiotics 20 (1/4):179-192.
The Dialogical Semiosis of Culture.Louis Francoeur - 1985 - American Journal of Semiotics 3 (3):121-130.
The Dialogical Semiosis of Culture.Louis Francoeur - 1985 - American Journal of Semiotics 3 (3):121-130.
Man in the Landscape: A Historic View of the Esthetics of Nature.Paul Shepard - 1967 - New York: Knopf; [Distributed by Random House].
Maastike semiootiline uurimine.Kati Lindström, Kalevi Kull & Hannes Palang - 2011 - Sign Systems Studies 39 (2/4):36-36.
Projections: Semiotics of Culture in Brazil.Irene Machado - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):463-476.
Projections: Semiotics of Culture in Brazil.Irene Machado - 2001 - Sign Systems Studies 29 (2):463-476.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2022-05-13

Total views
3 ( #1,357,225 of 2,505,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #209,579 of 2,505,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes