Strawson on 'if' and ⊃

Abstract
This paper is concerned with Sir Peter Strawson’s critical discussion of Paul Grice’s defence of the material implication analysis of conditionals. It argues that although Strawson’s own ‘consequentialist’ suggestion concerning the meaning of conditionals cannot be correct, a related and radically contextualist account is able to both account for the phenomena that motivated Strawson’s consequentialism, and to undermine the material implication analysis by providing a simpler account of the processes that we go through when interpreting conditionals.
Keywords Strawson  conditionals  Grice  material implication  contextualism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4314/sajpem.v27i3.31512
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,634
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sartre, Strawson and Others.Mark Sacks - 2005 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):275-299.
Commentary on Strawson's Target Article.H. P. Stapp - 2006 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 13 (s 10-11):163-169.
Conditionals.Frank Jackson (ed.) - 1987 - Oxford University Press.
The Evidence of Our Senses.John Hyman - 2003 - In Hans-Johann Glock (ed.), Strawson and Kant. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Added to PP index
2009-11-11

Total downloads
79 ( #76,324 of 2,236,125 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #267,594 of 2,236,125 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature