Sokal and Bricmont in their exposé of allegedly meaningless statements about science by recent French philosophers take errors of particular applications of philosophical ideas to science as refutations of the whole general framework utilized. They also seem to think that taking snippets out of context is sufficient to expose the "fashionable nonsense." In the early twentieth century, British analytic philosophers such as Bertrand Russell and A. N. Whitehead did the same with Hegel on mathematics. After deciding not to bother to read Hegel because of distaste for what he wrote about mathematics, Whitehead was later surprised to learn that his own relational process philosophy resembled that of Hegel in various respects.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review of S. Duffy, Virtual Mathematics: The Logic of Difference (Clinamen, 2006). [REVIEW]Colin McLarty - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (2):332-336.
Review of Steve Fuller, The Knowledge Book: Key Concepts in Philosophy. [REVIEW]Val Dusek - 2008 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (7).
Review of Jimena Canales, A Tenth of a Second: A History. [REVIEW]Val Dusek - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).
Book Review:The Holistic Inspirations of Physics: The Underground History of Electromagnetic Theory Val Dusek. [REVIEW]William Berkson - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):536-.
Review of Michael Eldred, The Digital Cast of Being: Metaphysics, Mathematics, Cartesianism, Cybernetics, Capitalism, Communication. [REVIEW]Val Dusek - 2010 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2010 (6).
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads4 ( #645,333 of 2,172,088 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,088 )
How can I increase my downloads?