Computer Science: features of Russian classification

Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):31-35 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article deals with Russian scientific classifications (GRNTI, VAK) of computer science in comparison with Western scien­tific classifications Fields of Science and Technology (FOS) and Universal Decimal Classification (UDS). The author analyzes the basics and principles of these classifications, identifies their strong and weak points as well as their influence on the devel­opment of computer sciences. She also provides some recom­mendations on adjustments of Russian scientific classifications aiming to make them more flexible and adaptive to the faster scientific and technological development and interdisciplinary cooperation.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,593

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Disciplinary classifications and normative regulation of science.Ilya T. Kasavin - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):23-30.
Philosophical approaches to classifications of sciences: biology.Olga E. Stoliarova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):36-42.
Le naturel est artificiel : l’héritage de la scientia scientiarum.Hope A. Olson, Jihee Beak & Inkyung Choi - 2013 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 66 (2):, [ p.].
Socio – technical disciplines in scientific classifications.Alexandra A. Argamakova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):48-51.
Classifications.Ludger Jansen - 2008 - Applied Ontology: An Introduction.
On values in recent american psychiatric classification.J. Agich George - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3).
William Whewell’s philosophy of science and Immanuel Kant’s apriorism.Tatiana D. Sokolova - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):180-185.
On Values in Recent American Psychiatric Classification.J. Z. Sadler, Y. F. Hulgus & G. J. Agich - 1994 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 19 (3):261-277.
Engineering: aspects of the object field construction.Evgeniy V. Maslanov - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (1):43-47.
Scientific kinds.Marc Ereshefsky & Thomas A. C. Reydon - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (4):969-986.
Philosophy of Computer Science.William J. Rapaport - 2005 - Teaching Philosophy 28 (4):319-341.
Poincaré’s Classification of Hypotheses and Their Role in Natural Science.María de Paz - 2015 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 29 (4):369-382.

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-16

Downloads
7 (#1,201,127)

6 months
2 (#668,348)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tatiana Sokolova
Russian Academy of Sciences

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references