Communicative Content and Legal Content


Authors
Lawrence B. Solum
Georgetown University
Abstract
This essay investigates a familiar set of questions about the relationship between legal texts (e.g., constitutions, statutes, opinions, orders, and contracts) and the content of the law (e.g., norms, rules, standards, doctrines, and mandates). Is the original meaning of the constitutional text binding on the Supreme Court when it develops doctrines of constitutional law? Should statutes be given their plain meaning or should judges devise statutory constructions that depart from the text to serve a purpose? What role should default rules play in the interpretation and construction of contracts? This essay makes two moves that can help lawyers and legal theorists answer these questions. First, there is a fundamental conceptual distinction between "communicative content" (the linguistic meaning communicated by a legal text in context) and "legal content" (the doctrines of the legal rules associated with a text). Second, the relationship between communicative content and legal content varies with context; different kinds of legal texts produce different relationships between linguistic meaning and legal rules
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,955
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Acquittal for Epistemicism.Hesam Mohamadi - 2018 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 31 (4):905-928.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Trouble for Legal Positivism.Danny Priel - 2006 - Legal Theory 12 (3):225-263.
Andrei Marmor: The Language of Law.Christopher Hutton - 2015 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 28 (2):423-426.
Structuring Legal Institutions.P. W. - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215-232.
Structuring Legal Institutions.Dick W. P. Ruiter - 1998 - Law and Philosophy 17 (3):215 - 232.
Trouble in Law's Empire: Rethinking Dworkin's Third Theory of Law.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2003 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (3):345-377.
Law and Content-Independent Reasons.P. Markwick - 2000 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (4):579-596.
Are There Any Rules?Timothy Endicott - 2001 - The Journal of Ethics 5 (3):199-219.
On Legal Order: Some Criticism of the Received View. [REVIEW]Riccardo Guastini - 2000 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 3 (3):263-272.
Innovative Techniques for Legal Text Retrieval.Marie-Francine Moens - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 9 (1):29-57.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-05-26

Total views
14 ( #490,692 of 2,319,366 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #585,520 of 2,319,366 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature