Characterizing the robustness of science: after the practice turn in philosophy of science

New York: Springer Verlag (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Featuring contributions from the world’s leading experts on the subject and based partly on several detailed case studies, this volume is the first comprehensive analysis of the scientific notion of robustness as well as of the general ...



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 86,377

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Philosophy of science and historical enquiry.John Losee - 1987 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Against Robustness? Strategies to Support the Reliability of Scientific Results.Léna Soler - 2014 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 28 (2):203-215.
How to Do Philosophy of Economics.Daniel M. Hausman - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:353 - 362.
How to test normative theories of science.David Baumslag - 2000 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 31 (2):267-275.
The Potential of Perspectivism for Science Education.Jacob V. Pearce - 2013 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 45 (5):531-545.
F. H. Bradley and the philosophy of science.W. J. Mander - 1991 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):65 – 78.


Added to PP

58 (#235,329)

6 months
3 (#339,399)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Philosophy of Psychiatry.Jonathan Y. Tsou - 2021 - Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Robustness and reality.Markus I. Eronen - 2015 - Synthese 192 (12):3961-3977.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references