Direct Realism and Immediate Justification

Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 112 (1pt1):29-44 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Direct realism with respect to perceptual experiences has two facets, an epistemological one and a metaphysical one. From the epistemological point of view it involves the claim that perceptual experiences provide immediate justification. From the metaphysical point of view it involves the claim that in perceptual experience we enter into direct contact with items in the external world. In a more radical formulation, often associated with naive realism, the metaphysical conception of direct realism involves the idea that perceptual experiences depend on the items in the external world they are related to. This paper describes a simple account that makes room for immediate justification provided by perceptual experience. The simple account establishes an explanatory relation between the justificatory role of a perceptual experience and the fact that such an experience provides a reason for a belief. The account is evaluated in the light of some objections. Different ways to react to those objections are discussed. It will appear that in order to preserve the explanatory relation established by the simple account, one has to accept naive realism. By breaking the connection between reason and justification, on the other side, one jeopardizes the possibility for perceptual experience to deliver immediate justification

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,199

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-07-14

Downloads
102 (#123,046)

6 months
2 (#297,737)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Gianfranco Soldati
Université de Fribourg

References found in this work

Mind and World.John Mcdowell - 1996 - Philosophical Quarterly 46 (182):99-109.
Nonconceptual content and the "space of reasons".Richard G. Heck - 2000 - Philosophical Review 109 (4):483-523.
Mind and World.Hilary Putnam - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (2):267.
Can Empirical Knowledge Have a Foundation?Laurence Bonjour - 1978 - American Philosophical Quarterly 15 (1):1-14.
Seeing and Knowing.L. C. Holborow - 1971 - Philosophical Quarterly 21 (82):82-83.

View all 9 references / Add more references