At the end of a paper on international research ethics published in the July-August 2010 issue of the Hastings Center Report, London and Zollman argue the need for grounding our duties in international medical and health-related research within a broader normative framework of social, distributive, and rectificatory justice. The same goes for Thomas Pogge, who, in a whole range of publications during the past years, has argued for a human-rights-based approach to international research. In a thought-provoking paper in the June 2010 issue of the American Journal of Bioethics, Angela J. Ballantyne argues that “the global bioethics priority” in medical and health-related research ethics today is how to do research fairly in an unjust world
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s096318011100003x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,775
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

How to Do Research Fairly in an Unjust World.Angela J. Ballantyne - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (6):26-35.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Bioethics on the Couch.Jan Helge Solbakk - 2013 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 22 (3):319-327.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What is Fair and Equitable Benefit-Sharing?Bram De Jonge - 2011 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (2):127-146.
Sharing the Benefits of Research Fairly: Two Approaches.Joseph Millum - 2012 - Journal of Medical Ethics 38 (4):219-223.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #461,702 of 2,432,658 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #464,745 of 2,432,658 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes