Locke's empiricism and the postulation of unobservables

Journal of the History of Philosophy 23 (3):339-369 (1985)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.1985.0055
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 38,035
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is Locke’s Theory of Knowledge Inconsistent?Samuel C. Rickless - 2008 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 77 (1):83-104.
Locke on Knowing Our Own Ideas.Shelley Weinberg - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3).
Locke on Knowing Our Own Ideas.Shelley Weinberg - 2016 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 97 (3):347-370.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Locke's Theory of Reflection.Kevin Scharp - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (1):25 – 63.
Postulation and Materialism.George S. Pappas - 1982 - Philosophical Studies 41 (January):71-82.
Boskovic's Unobservables.Zvonimir Čuljak - 1993 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7 (3):211 – 224.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
27 ( #250,003 of 2,312,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #492,511 of 2,312,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature