Nietzsche's Virtues: A Personal Inquiry: Robert C. Solomon

Give style to your character, a great and rare art. Nietzsche Gay Science What are we to make of Nietzsche? There has been an explosion of scholarship over the past twenty years, much of it revealing and insightful, a good deal of it controversial if not polemical. The controversy and polemics are for the most part straight from Nietzsche, of course, and the scholarly disputes over what he ‘really’ meant are rather innocuous and often academic compared with what Nietzsche meant with his conscientiously inflammatory rhetoric and hyperbole. We have been treated to extended debates about Nietzsche's politics, his attacks on Christianity and morality, his famed notion of the übermensch and his less lampooned doctrine of the ‘eternal recurrence’. We have recently heard Nietzsche reinterpreted as an analytic philosopher, as a deconstructionist, as a feminist, even as a closet Christian and a liberal. Stephen Aschheim suggests in his recent book that Nietzsche provides us with something like a Rorschach test, inviting readers with amazingly different commitments and ideologies to ‘make their own Nietzsche’. But there is another approach to Nietzsche, something quite different from interpreting him in terms of his various ‘theses’ and positions, unpacking his ‘system’ or repeating unhelpfully that he displayed no such coherence and consistency, something more than finding out ‘who’ Nietzsche is as opposed to what we have made out of him. The simplest way of getting at this alternative approach might be to ask, what Nietzsche would make of us? I grant that this is a bit cryptic, and it invites a variety of unflattering answers. But I think it is very much in the spirit of what he are all about. It is an intimately personal approach to Nietzsche, an approach that will, no doubt, be somewhat different for each and every one of us. But that, too, of course, is just what Nietzsche would have demanded.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1358246100006688
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,293
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Explanations.R. Nozick - 1981 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 35 (1):83-85.
Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Alasdair Macintyre - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):363-363.
Nietzsche on Truth and Philosophy.Maudemarie Clark - 1994 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54 (1):229-233.
Beyond Good and Evil.Friedrich Nietzsche & Helen Zimmern - 1908 - International Journal of Ethics 18 (4):517-518.
Nietzsche: Life as Literature.Richard Schacht & Alexander Nehamas - 1988 - Philosophical Review 97 (2):266.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Nietzsche's Double Binds: Giuseppe Fornari and René Girard on Nietzsche's Thought.Martino Pesenti Gritti - 2013 - Contagion: Journal of Violence, Mimesis, and Culture 20:141-162.
The Gay Science.Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche - 1974 - New York: Vintage Books.
Reading Nietzsche.Robert C. Solomon (ed.) - 1988 - Oup Usa.
Why Nietzsche Embraced Eternal Recurrence.John Nolt - 2008 - History of European Ideas 34 (3):310-323.
Nietzsche, Eternal Recurrence, and the Horror of Existence.Philip J. Kain - 2007 - Journal of Nietzsche Studies 33 (1):49-63.
Freedom, the Overman, and Style in Nietzsche's Philosophy.Charles Dale Woodward - 1983 - Dissertation, University of Southern California


Added to PP index

Total views
46 ( #183,525 of 2,271,048 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #332,631 of 2,271,048 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature