Responses to critics

Perspectives on Science 16 (3):pp. 280-284 (2008)

Authors
Miriam Solomon
Temple University
Abstract
In this paper I respond to the criticisms of Helen Longino, Alan Richardson, Naomi Oreskes and Sharyn Clough. There is discussion of the character of social knowledge, the goals of scientific inquiry, the connections between Social Empiricism and other approaches in science studies, productive and unproductive dissent, and the distinction between empirical and non-empirical decision vectors.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/posc.2008.16.3.280
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,425
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Autonomy and Objectivity of Science.Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen - 2012 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 26 (3):309-334.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
53 ( #166,893 of 2,286,314 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #417,385 of 2,286,314 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature