The Political Deficit of Immanent Critique. On Jaeggi's Objections to Walzer's Criticism

Critical Horizons 22 (2):128-139 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT The paper aims to show that Rahel Jaeggi's objections to Walzer's model of internal critique are in many respects inconsistent, and above all that these objections are a sign of a political deficit in the neo-Hegelian methodology adopted by Jaeggi to develop her model of immanent critique. The same deficit concerns Jaeggi's use of Marx's model of the critique of ideology, which can be fruitfully reworked by Walzer's reinterpretation of Gramsci's theory of the struggle for hegemony.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,139

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Defending Immanent Critique.Dan Sabia - 2010 - Political Theory 38 (5):684-711.
Michael Walzer and the Critical Connection.Tyler T. Roberts - 1994 - Journal of Religious Ethics 22 (2):333 - 353.
The political philosophy of Walzer’s social criticism.James Gregory - 2010 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (9):1093-1111.
Qu'est-ce que la critique de l'idéologie?Rahel Jaeggi - 2008 - Actuel Marx 43 (1):96-108.
Hegel, Adorno and the Origins of Immanent Criticism.James Gordon Finlayson - 2014 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 22 (6):1142-1166.
Eschatology in the political theory of Michael Walzer.Alan Revering - 2005 - Journal of Religious Ethics 33 (1):91-117.
Michael Walzer and Social Criticism.Karen Eloise Greenstreet - 1994 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-05

Downloads
19 (#732,197)

6 months
3 (#760,965)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Marco Solinas
Scuola Superiore di Studi Universitari e di Perfezionamento Sant'Anna