The Cosmopolitan Constitution

Oxford University Press UK (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Originally the constitution was expected to express and channel popular sovereignty. It was the work of freedom, springing from and facilitating collective self-determination. After the Second World War this perspective changed: the modern constitution owes its authority not only to collective authorship, it also must commit itself credibly to human rights. Thus people recede into the background, and the national constitution becomes embedded into one or other system of 'peer review' among nations.This is what Alexander Somek argues is the creation of the cosmopolitan constitution. Reconstructing what he considers to be the three stages in the development of constitutionalism, he argues that the cosmopolitan constitution is not a blueprint for the constitution beyond the nation state, let alone a constitution of the international community; rather, it stands for constitutional law reaching out beyond its national bounds. This cosmopolitan constitution has two faces: the first, political, face reflects the changed circumstances of constitutional authority. It conceives itself as constrained by international human rights protection, firmly committed to combating discrimination on the grounds of nationality, and to embracing strategies for managing its interaction with other sites of authority, such as the United Nations. The second, administrative, face of the cosmopolitan constitution reveals the demise of political authority, which has been traditionally vested in representative bodies. Political processes yield to various, and often informal, strategies of policy co-ordination so long as there are no reasons to fear that the elementary civil rights might be severely interfered with. It represents constitutional authority for an administered world.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Against Originalism: Getting over the U. S. constitution.Austin W. Bramwell - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):431-453.
‘We the People of the United States…’: The Matrix and the Realisation of Constitutional Sovereignty. [REVIEW]Kirsty Duncanson - 2011 - International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 24 (4):385-404.
The Features of the Mexican Constitution.Elena Vaitiekienė - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 115 (1):89-121.
What Is a Political Constitution?Graham Gee & Grégoire C. N. Webber - 2010 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 30 (2):273-299.
Constitutionalism: philosophical foundations.Larry Alexander (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Freedom and Permission The Constitutional Concepts of the Freedom of the Individual.Andras Bragyova - 2005 - Archiv für Rechts- Und Sozialphilosophie 91 (3):379-408.
In Defence of the Common Law Constitution: Unwritten Rights as Fundamental Law.Trs Allan - 2009 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 22 (1):187-203.
Constitutional Interpretation and Original Meaning.David Lyons - 1986 - Social Philosophy and Policy 4 (1):75.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-09-27

Downloads
1 (#1,769,934)

6 months
1 (#1,040,386)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Democracy disembedded.Nenad Dimitrijevic - 2018 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 44 (10):1049-1070.
Legal Positivism’s Legitimate Heir?Samuel I. Tschorne - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (150):91-112.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Paradoxes of Autonomy: On the Dialectics of Freedom and Normativity.Thomas Khurana - 2013 - Symposium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy/Revue canadienne de philosophie continentale 17 (1):50-74.

Add more references