Mystical Union and Deconstruction

Philosophy and Theology 15 (1):3-18 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this essay, I criticize John Caputo’s deconstructive analysis of the nature of mystical union. Using the works of St. John of the Cross, I show that the notion of mystical union does not belong to “the metaphysics of presence.” I also discuss the true significance of deconstruction for the study of mysticism.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Plotinus, mysticism, and mediation.A. R. P. Robert - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (2):145-163.
‘Undecidability’ or ‘anticipatory resoluteness’ Caputo in conversation with Heidegger.Sylvie Avakian - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 77 (2):123-139.
A Passion for the Impossible: John D. Caputo in Focus.Mark Dooley (ed.) - 2003 - State University of New York Press.
On Remembering and Forgetting Being.Thomas A. F. Kelly - 2002 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 76 (2):321-340.
The mystical element in Heidegger's thought.John D. Caputo - 1978 - New York: Fordham University Press.
Mystical experience, mystical doctrine, mystical technique.Peter Moore - 1978 - In Steven T. Katz (ed.), Mysticism and philosophical analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 101--131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-01-09

Downloads
30 (#502,094)

6 months
1 (#1,444,594)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references