Voter ignorance and the democratic ideal

Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 12 (4):413-458 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Abstract If voters do not understand the programs of rival candidates or their likely consequences, they cannot rationally exercise control over government. An ignorant electorate cannot achieve true democratic control over public policy. The immense size and scope of modern government makes it virtually impossible for voters to acquire sufficient knowledge to exercise such control. The problem is exacerbated by voters? strong incentive to be ?rationally ignorant? of politics. This danger to democracy cannot readily be circumvented through ?shortcut? methods of economizing on voter knowledge costs. A truly democratic government must, therefore, be strictly limited in scope.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,998

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Democracy and voter ignorance revisited: Rejoinder to Ciepley.Ilya Somin - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (1):99-111.
Democracy despite voter ignorance: A Weberian reply to Somin and Friedman.David Ciepley - 1999 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 13 (1-2):191-227.
The persuasiveness of democratic majorities.Robert E. Goodin & David Estlund - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):131-142.
Three conceptions of democratic control.Philip Pettit - 2008 - Constellations 15 (1):46-55.
Defining democratic decision making.Gustaf Arrhenius - 2011 - In Frans Svensson & Rysiek Silwinski (eds.), Neither/Nor - Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Erik Carlson on the Occasion of His Fiftieth Birthday. Uppsala: Uppsala Philosophical Studies. pp. 13-29.
Does public ignorance defeat deliberative democracy? [REVIEW]Robert B. Talisse - 2004 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 16 (4):455-463.
Democracy and equality.Steven Wall - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (228):416–438.
Consensus and power in deliberative democracy.Tim6 Heysse - 2006 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 49 (3):265 – 289.
Do politicians pander?Ilya Somin - 2000 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 14 (2-3):147-155.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-10-18

Downloads
151 (#125,176)

6 months
26 (#112,374)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How Smart is Democracy? You Can't Answer that Question a Priori.Jason Brennan - 2014 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 26 (1-2):33-58.
The Ongoing Debate Over Political Ignorance: Reply to My Critics.Ilya Somin - 2015 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 27 (3-4):380-414.
Popper, Weber, and Hayek: The epistemology and politics of ignorance.Jeffrey Friedman - 2005 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 17 (1-2):1-58.
How elitism undermines the study of voter competence.Arthur Lupia - 2006 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 18 (1-3):217-232.
Two Forms of the Straw Man.Robert Talisse & Scott F. Aikin - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):345-352.

View all 73 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Political Liberalism.John Rawls - 1993 - Columbia University Press.
Taking rights seriously.Ronald Dworkin (ed.) - 1977 - London: Duckworth.
Democracy and disagreement.Amy Gutmann - 1996 - Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. Edited by Dennis F. Thompson.
Democracy and Disagreement.Amy Gutmann & Dennis Thompson - 1996 - Ethics 108 (3):607-610.

View all 34 references / Add more references