Globalisation Considering the Multitude of Worlds This book deals with globalisation, its foundations, its rise and fall and the question of its future. It discusses the conditions that have led, each in its own way, to the reduction of the many worlds to one. The first foundations were laid in the time of the discoveries, the earth was recognised and measured as a unified space. Missionary work and colonisation have made the geographical unit into a unity of fundamental beliefs, values and Western European languages. The brisk trade with the colonies also unified the financial and economic situation of the conquered foreign worlds, which were managed according to Western patterns. The small gain of the political independence of the states achieved in the decolonisation movement was unfortunately destroyed by the great losses already suffered in the area of the fundamental values of the original worlds, their languages, their ways of living, their faith. In the new situation it became apparent that the economic dependence on the former colonial states was increasing rather than decreasing, the way of doing politics had remained by habit that of the colonial powers. Decolonisation was not a way back to the old world. Two metaphysical assumptions of globalisation are discussed in more detail. One is the assumption of realism that the world is one. This assumption justifies missionary and colonialist action. On the other hand, there is the thesis of liberalism that the being of the beings is its economic value. Against the realistic assumption of the one world, arguments are put forward which justify and make plausible the opposite assumption of a multitude of worlds. Now that the world is de facto one thanks to globalisation, and now that it is suffering from problems that affect all people, a new kind of globalisation is needed, one that recognises and respects different worlds on the one hand, but is nevertheless capable of tackling environmental, financial and social problems together. Depending on the subject, two very different ways of reasoning are used. In the preparatory historical part, the arguments are empirical and stick to details; in the part dealing with the justification of the multiplicity of worlds, the argumentation is theoretical, not to say speculative.
Keywords globalisation  colonialisation  realism  liberalism  difference world - culture  culture  many worlds  missionary work
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

One World and Many Worlds.Henning Ottmann - 2009 - Synthesis Philosophica 24 (1):7-17.
On the Plurality of Worlds.David Lewis - 1986 - Wiley-Blackwell.
Tense Logic for Nondeterministic Time.Ewa Orlowska - 1982 - Bulletin of the Section of Logic 11 (3-4):127-131.
Possible Worlds: Structure and Stuff.Manuel Pérez Otero - 2010 - Philosophical Papers 39 (2):209-237.
On Possibility and Possible Worlds.Tony Daniel Roy - 1991 - Dissertation, University of California, Davis
The Best of All Possible Worlds.C. Brown & Y. Nagasawa - 2005 - Synthese 143 (3):309-320.


Added to PP index

Total views
267 ( #39,780 of 2,498,529 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
35 ( #24,914 of 2,498,529 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes