Implicit metacognition, explicit uncertainty, and the monitoring/control distinction in animal metacognition

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):355-356 (2003)

Abstract
Smith et al. demonstrate the viability of animal metacognition research. We commend their effort and suggest three avenues of research. The first concerns whether animals are explicitly aware of their metacognitive processes. The second asks whether animals have metaknowledge of their own uncertain responses. The third issue concerns the monitoring/control distinction. We suggest some ways in which these issues elucidate metacognitive processes in nonhuman animals
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X03400083
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,179
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Metacognition and Consciousness.Asher Koriat - 2007 - In P D Zelazo, M Moscovitch & E Thompson (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
Monitoring Without Metacognition.Peter Carruthers - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):342-343.
Toward a Cognitive Neuroscience of Metacognition.Arthur P. Shimamura - 2000 - Consciousness and Cognition 9 (2):313-323.
Drawing the Line on Metacognition.Janet Metcalfe - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3):350-351.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
127 ( #65,465 of 2,285,627 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
57 ( #14,938 of 2,285,627 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature