History of European Ideas 35 (1):24-37 (2009)

Jean-Jacques Rousseau's attack on the natural jurisprudence of Grotius, Hobbes and Pufendorf is well known. But what happened to modern natural jurisprudence after Rousseau not very well known. The aim of this article is to try to show how and why it turned into what Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyès called “social science” and the bearing that this Rousseau-inspired transformation has on making sense of ideology, or the moral and political thought of the late eighteenth-century French ideologues
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.histeuroideas.2008.09.006
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,388
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Philosophical Investigations.[author unknown] - 1991 - Wiley.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

David Hume and Eighteenth-Century America.Mark G. Spencer - 2005 - University of Rochester Press.
Arguing for Miracles in the Eighteenth-Century Public Sphere.Luke Brekke - 2009 - Eighteenth-Century Thought 4:111 - 142.
The Phoenix of Ideology.Gayil Talshir - 2005 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8 (2):107-124.
Why Study the History of Political Thought?Dick Howard - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (5):519-531.


Added to PP index

Total views
20 ( #534,614 of 2,445,563 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,182 of 2,445,563 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes