American Journal of Semiotics 34 (1):65-86 (2018)

Abstract
From the point of view of semiotics, the essential contribution of John Deely consists in having made us all aware of the richness of the Scholastic heritage, and to have explained it to us latter-day semioticians. Even for those, who, like the present author, think that semiotics was alive and well between the dawn of the Latin Age, and the rediscovery of Scholastic realism by Peirce, the notions coined by the Scholastic philosophers are intriguing. To make sense of scholastic notions such as ens reale and ens rationis is not a straightforward matter, but it is worthwhile trying to do so, in particular by adapting these notions to ideas more familiar in the present age. Starting out from the notions of Scholastic Realism, we try in the following to make sense of the different meanings of meaning, only one of which is the sign. It will be suggested that there are counterparts to ens rationis, not only in the thinking of some contemporary philosophers, but also, in a more convoluted way, in the discussion within cognitive science about different extensions to the mind. The recurrent theme of the paper will be Deely’s musing, according to which signs, unlike any other kind of being, form relations which may connect things which are mind-dependent and mind-independent. The import of this proposition is quite different if is applied to what we will call the Augustinian notion of the sign, or to the Fonseca notion, which is better termed intentionality. In both cases, however, mind-dependence will be shown to have a fundamental part to play. Following upon the redefinition of Medieval philosophy suggested by Deely, we will broach a redefinition of something even wider: meaning even beyond signs.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0277-7126
DOI 10.5840/ajs201851436
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,639
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Meaning Redefined in Advance.Göran Sonesson - forthcoming - American Journal of Semiotics.
Anselm on Nothing.Ben Novak - 2008 - International Philosophical Quarterly 48 (3):305-320.
Does Christian Faith Rule Out Human Autonomy?Louis Roy - 2012 - Heythrop Journal 53 (4):606-623.
Metaphor and Meaning.Alec Hyslop - 2001 - Sorites 13:23-32.
Ethical Properties and Divine Commands.Scott Davis - 1983 - Journal of Religious Ethics 11 (2):280 - 300.
The True Abuse of Futility.Laura Miller-Smith - 2018 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 60 (3):403-407.
Reality.Jocelyn Benoist - 2014 - Meta:21-27.
Meaning In Speech and In Thought.Stephen Schiffer - 2013 - Philosophical Quarterly 63 (250):141-159.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-09-07

Total views
13 ( #682,731 of 2,331,392 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #588,490 of 2,331,392 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes