American Journal of Semiotics 35 (1):11-32 (2019)

Abstract
Thanks to Bruno Galantucci, “experimental semiotics” is usually nowadays taken to mean the study of “novel forms of communication which people develop when they cannot use pre-established communication systems”. In spite of Galantucci’s claim to have picked the label because it was free, it has actually been used in different ways at least twice before: by Colin Ware, who takes it to be involved with “the elucidation of symbols that gain their meaning by being structured to take advantage of the human sensory apparatus”, as opposed to conventional meaning-making, and by Kashima and Haslam, who apply it to complex social situations. The label could also conveniently be used to describe the kind of experiment that we have realized at Centre for Cognitive Semiotics, which are classical psychological experiments which have been enriched with a focus on the particular semiotic resources involved, while also applying phenomenological analysis to both the experimental situation and its outcome. These are all reductive uses of the terms “experimental” and “semiotics”. In fact, although Galantucci himself refers to Psammetichus’s famous experiment as being roughly analogous to his understanding of experimental semiotics, there are important differences, the Psammetichus experiment, in spite of its intentions, being more unbiased, if it could really be accomplished. Pursuing the principle that I have called the dialects of phenomenology and experiment, and what Jordan Zlatev has termed the conceptual-empirical loop, I will suggest, in the present paper, that these different experimental approaches can be related to different varieties of semiosis, thus helping us to spell out the full task of the discipline termed cognitive semiotics. This, in turn, will help us determine the full scope of cognitive semiotics, while also highlighting the importance of the semiotic part, that is, the attention to meaning, revealed by phenomenology.
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Language and Literature  Semiotics
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0277-7126
DOI 10.5840/ajs201952249
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,447
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Introduction.Jamin Pelkey, Sophia Melanson & Richard Rosenbaum - 2019 - American Journal of Semiotics 35 (1):1-9.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Experiment of Psammetichus: Fact, Fiction, and Model to Follow.Antoni Sulek - 1989 - Journal of the History of Ideas 50 (4):645.
Meaning Redefined in Advance.Göran Sonesson - forthcoming - American Journal of Semiotics.
Beyond the “Tragedy of Culture” in Advance.Göran Sonesson - forthcoming - American Journal of Semiotics.
People with Down Syndrome - Part of Our Community.Kerri Anne Brussen - 2012 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 18 (2):1.
Bizarre Behaviors: Boundaries of Psychiatric Disorder. [REVIEW]T. Brink - 1991 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (4):549-550.
Moral Responsibility and Tourette Syndrome.Timothy Schroeder - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 71 (1):106-123.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-24

Total views
4 ( #1,170,615 of 2,330,440 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #584,494 of 2,330,440 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes