Evolution: Teleology or chance? [Book Review]


Abstract
Revaluation of the problem of natural teleology seems an important precondition for elucidating our environmental crisis and for formulating an 'econological ethics', because it calls for a recognition of an intrinsic value in nature and organisms. Therefore, it is necessary to show that the concept of natural teleology is not in contradiction with scientific theories, in particular not with the theory of evolution. In this paper I shall argue that there is a fundamental misunderstanding about the concepts of teleology and chance in modern thinking. This as a result of a radical transformation of the Aristotelian concept of teleology by Christian theologians during the Middle Ages. This confusion resulted in the rejection of teleology from evolution and in an exaggeration of the role of chance. However, not a solution for the problem of teleology is given here, but only an attempt to prove that neither the fossil-record, nor the role of chance in evolution can give adequate arguments for the negation of teleology in evolution. That is not to say that, therefore there exists teleology in evolution, but the problem of teleology in nature cannot, be solved by the scientific theory of evolution, but only be elucidated by philosophical analysis. At the end of the paper it is argued that teleology must be rather presupposed in evolution
Keywords evolution  teleology  chance  purpose  anthropomorphism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF01801253
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 49,017
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Nature of Selection.Elliott Sober - 1986 - Behaviorism 14 (1):77-88.
The Structure of Science.Ernest Nagel - 1961 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):275-275.
The Philosophy of Biology.David L. Hull & Michael Ruse (eds.) - 1973 - London: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Biological Science.David L. Hull - 1974 - Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall.

View all 17 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Kantian Stance on Teleology in Biology.Alix A. Cohen - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):109 - 121.
Kant, Teleology, and Evolution.Daniel Kolb - 1992 - Synthese 91 (1-2):9 - 28.
The Role of Teleonomy in Evolution.Grace A. De Laguna - 1962 - Philosophy of Science 29 (2):117 - 131.
Teleology.Andrew Woodfield - 1976 - Cambridge University Press.
Kant on Biological Teleology: Towards a Two-Level Interpretation.Marcel Quarfood - 2006 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 37 (4):735-747.
The Irony of Chance.Pascal Massie - 2003 - International Philosophical Quarterly 43 (1):15-28.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
66 ( #137,366 of 2,310,985 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #86,766 of 2,310,985 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature