Acta Analytica 24 (1):11-15 (2009)
In “The Reappearing Act” István Aranyosi postulates a new way of seeing to solve a puzzle posed in “The Disappearing Act;” an object that is exactly shaded can be seen simply by virtue of its contrast with its environment – just like a shadow. This object need not reflect, refract, absorb or block light. To undermine the motive for this heretical innovation, I generalize the puzzle to situations involving inexact shading. Aranyosi cannot extend his solution to these variations because he needs to conserve principles of camouflage. On the bright side, the solution to the puzzle that I propose in my book Seeing Dark Things does extend to these variations.
|Keywords||Shadow Paradox Vision Hole Crack Perception|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Chalmers' Zombie Argument.István Aranyosi - 2005 - In Type-a Dualism: A Novel Theory of the Mental-Physical Nexus. Dissertation, Central European University.
Type-a Dualism: A Novel Theory of the Mental-Physical Nexus.Istvan A. Aranyosi - 2005 - Dissertation, Central European University
Physicalism and Its Discontents.István Aranyosi - 2002 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):363-370.
Review of Roy Sorensen's Seeing Dark Things. The Philosophy of Shadows. [REVIEW]István Aranyosi - 2008 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 86 (3):513-515.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads26 ( #195,892 of 2,169,146 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #345,568 of 2,169,146 )
How can I increase my downloads?