Philosophical Quarterly 56 (223):213 - 223 (2006)
Suppose you have an infinite past. If you had banked the spare dollar you have always had, then the interest would have made you rich by now. Your procrastination is inexcusable. But what should you have done? At any time at which you invest the dollar you would regret not investing it earlier. Satisficers can solve prospective puzzles involving infinite choice but cannot solve this retrospective puzzle about regret. A moral version of the puzzle suggests that there can be inevitable moral failure. It does so without appeal to moral luck, moral dilemmas or original sin
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Rational Dilemmas and Rational Supererogation.Michael Slote - 1986 - Philosophical Topics 14 (2):59-76.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Moral Dilemmas and Moral Luck.M. V. Dougherty - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:233-246.
Moral Dilemmas, Collective Responsibility, and Moral Progress.Patricia Marino - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 104 (2):203 - 225.
Moral Dilemmas and Comparative Conceptions of Morality.Peter Vallentyne - 1992 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 30 (1):117-124.
The Definition of Moral Dilemmas: A Logical Problem. [REVIEW]De Haan Jurriaan - 2001 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 4 (3):267-284.
The Moral Dilemmas Debate, Deontic Logic, and the Impotence of Argument.Todd Bernard Weber - 2002 - Argumentation 16 (4):459-472.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads31 ( #163,813 of 2,158,485 )
Recent downloads (6 months)5 ( #64,770 of 2,158,485 )
How can I increase my downloads?