The Role of Memory in Agential Self-Knowledge

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 50 (3):413-425 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
Agentialism about self-knowledge is the view that key to understanding our capacity for self-knowledge is appreciating the connection between that capacity and our identities as rational agents—as creatures for whom believing, intending, desiring, and so on are manifestations of a capacity to be responsive to reasons. This connection, agentialists maintain, consists in the fact that coming to know our own minds involves an exercise of our rational capacities in the service of answering the relevant first-order question. Agentialists face the task of accounting for the connection between our identities as rational agents and our capacity to know our stored beliefs. It’s plausible that one comes to know that one believes that p by exercising one’s rational capacities in those cases where the belief that p is formed on the basis of present consideration of the reasons for and against p. But what exactly is the relevance of our rational capacities in the case where one has already formed the belief in question? In this paper I provide an answer to this question. That answer involves an appeal to a particular model of memory. According to the model I favor, memory preserves, in addition to the content of one’s beliefs, one’s commitment to their truth.
Keywords Memory  Self-Knowledge  Agentialism  Transparency  Agency
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/can.2019.51
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon - 1998 - Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Reasons and Persons.Derek Parfit - 1984 - Oxford University Press.
Practical Reality.Jonathan Dancy - 2000 - Oxford University Press.

View all 36 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Self‐Knowledge and Rational Agency: A Defense of Empiricism.Brie Gertler - 2018 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 96 (1):91-109.
The Agential Point of View.Ben Sorgiovanni - 2019 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 100 (2):549-572.
Defeasibility and Memory Knowledge.Andrew Naylor - 1982 - Mind 91 (July):432-437.
Two Forms of Memory Knowledge and Epistemological Disjunctivism.Joe Milburn & Andrew Moon - forthcoming - In Casey Doyle, Joe Milburn & Duncan Pritchard (eds.), New Issues in Epistemological Disjunctivism. Routledge.
Justification in Memory Knowledge.Andrew Naylor - 1983 - Synthese 55 (2):269 - 286.
Memory.William Earle - 1956 - Review of Metaphysics 10 (1):3-27.
Non-Rational Aspects of Skilled Agency.Yannig Luthra - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (8):2267-2289.
Knowledge From Forgetting.Sven Bernecker & Thomas Grundmann - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (3):525-540.
Memory, Epistemology Of.Matthew Frise - 2015 - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
No Need to Know.Matthew Frise - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):391-401.
Memory, Imagery, and Self-Knowledge.Dustin Stokes - forthcoming - Avant: Special Issue-Thinking with Images.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-28

Total views
61 ( #148,401 of 2,309,317 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
61 ( #11,080 of 2,309,317 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature